This analysis of Barbie is then developed into an explanation of how Full could be seen as an extension of capitalist markets to include the larger Islamic revivalism sweeping over the Middle East. To conclude, I will consider Full as a possible place of agency for young girls and women alike, using an analysis drawn from a large study on the reception of McDonald’s in East Asia. Keywords: Barbie doll; cultural imperialism; feminist studies; Muslim; native consumer In 2003, after four years of design, a Syrian company called Newborn Design Studio introduced a new doll that sparked both controversy and immense popularity.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
This Barbie look-alike doll was named ‘Full’ (Scope, 2005). Designed with two outdoor fashions, Full wears either a black head-to-toe outfit called an bay and a black headscarf (marketed to more conservative Middle Eastern countries in the Persian Gulf region); or a fashionable white or light blue long coat with a white headscarf which was marketed to more liberal countries in the Eastern Mediterranean area (Nelson, 2005).
Underneath these outdoor fashions in which girls are encouraged to Reese their dolls when leaving the house (Nelson, 2005), Full can wear a wide variety of fashionable, Western clothes, including t-shirts and Jeans (Labia, 2006). While there have been other veiled Barbie dolls and veiled Barbie doll look-alike developed in the past, such as Dark and Sara from Iran, Roseanne from a U. S. Company, and several Barbie dolls from the Dolls of the World Collection (Ductile, 2003; Okapi, 2007; Yakima, 2007), what makes Full unique and what led to her vast popularity is the personality that was created for her.
Similar to Barbie, Full is reconsider with characteristics popular in the region in which she was developed. However, as Scope (2005) explains, Full is constructed as a more modest version of Barbie by being typified as a good, modest Muslim girl who is very caring, loving and deeply respectful of her parents. Additionally, she has respectable occupations, such as being a teacher or a doctor, and is usually shown in advertisements engaged in activities such as prayer, baking and reading (Scope, 2005). The initial research for this project began by studying mainstream newspapers situated in the U.
S. Toward the end of an article printed by the New York Times, one Full skeptic was quoted as saying, “If this doll had come out 10 years ago, I don’t think it would have been very popular. Full is part of a great cultural shift… Syria used to be a very secular country, but when people don’t have anything to believe in anymore, they turn toward religion,” (Scope, 2005). Given that the notion of ‘cultural shift’ was only partially explained, it appeared worthwhile to investigate it more fully by studying selected aspects of recent Syrian history.
Page 1 of 7 http://www. Review. Maim. C. NZ In 1963, seventeen years after gaining independence from France, the secular Bath Party rose to power in Syria through a non-violent coup (CIA World Fastback, 2008). This regime rendered Islam unimportant and created many anti-lilacs laws, ranging from a ban on any Islamic education outside of the mosque to a ban on women and girls wearing headscarves in public schools (Kisser, 2005). The Bath Party found stability in 1970 when Hafiz al-Sad rose to power where he remained until his death in 2000.
While still maintaining a secular state, Sad subtly reinserted tolerance of Muslims within his personal life to build alliances with urban Sunnis by participating in prayers, making his pilgrimage to Mecca, and increasing the salaries of Sunnis clerics (Kisser, 2005). These attempts were too few too late, and in 1976, a Muslim group called the Muslim Brotherhood revolted against the Bath Party to instill a Syrian Islamic state. The revolt ended in 1982 in Ham when the Syrian military suppressed the revolt by killing thousands of people in the city.
After this revolt failed, the Muslim Brotherhood ceased its existence in Syria in response to the group being outlawed (Kisser, 2005). About a decade after the revolts, the government loosened the anti-lilacs sanctions to keep a growing Islamic movement from rebelling. Some of these changes included an increased acceptance of Muslim activity including regular attendance at mosques, tolerance of a variety of Muslim garb being worn in public, and the release of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood who were imprisoned after the uprisings in the early sass, among others (Kisser, 2005).
Additionally, as Loyal Kisser says, “during [Sad’s] rule, mosques were built, prayer houses were renovated, religious colleges ere opened, and ancient sites were reconstructed in order to preserve the Arab and Islamic nature of [Syrian] soil,” (Kisser, 2005, p. 51). A more marked change in state policy occurred, however, after Hafiz al-Sad passed away and his son, Basher al-Sad came into power.
Basher al-Sad took Islamic tolerance a step further than his father and overturned many policies that had prevented Islamic activity from prospering, including the laws that prohibited wearing the veil in public schools and prayer in the military (Kisser, 2005). Given these changes at the beginning of the 21st century and the changes that occurred in As previously mentioned, Full was released in Syria in 2003вЂ?only three years after the second Sad came into power and during a steadily increasing Islamic revivalism in both Syria and across the Middle East (Clansman, 2008).
Indeed, nearly a year before Full made her appearance on Syrian toy store shelves, Saudi Arabia banned Barbie after religious leaders deemed Barbie a “threat to morality, complaining that the revealing clothes of the ‘Jewish’ toy… Are offensive to Islam” (Yakima, 2007, p. 180). The negative comment made by Saudi politicians about Barbie being Jewish is robbery two-pronged: (a) Ruth Handler, Barbie’s creator, was Jewish and, therefore, Barbie was probably considered Jewish by association; and (b) Arab countries are staunchly against the Israeli state and all have long histories of institutional anti- Semitism.
By including “Jewish” in the explanation of why Barbie is problematic, Islam gets re-inscribed as moral while Barbie is cast off as amoral by being Jewish. The combination of Full’s would-be competition being banned for her problematic values and appearance alongside an Islamic revivalist movement, parents and girls alike were searching for their moral Barbie substitute. Given the timing of Full’s debut, Newborn Design Studio was probably taking advantage of a newfound market (the concept of Full as a capitalist endeavor will be explained further in the next section).
The appearance of Full in Syria at this specific historical moment marks the spread of Islamic revivalism not only among a group of college-educated people (as it had been in the beginning), but one that is rapidly spreading across all socioeconomic classes (Clansman, 2008; Ghats, 2006). Page 2 of 7 Full: A symbol of cultural imperialism and a capitalist mime Following routes laid out y traditional colonization by Europe, the U. S. Swooped into the Middle East and resurrected notions of cultural superiority of the West through popular culture in the late 20th century.
James Peters’ article entitled “Cultural Imperialism in the Late 20th Century’ defines cultural imperialism as a “systematic penetration and domination of the cultural life of the popular classes by the ruling class of the West in order to reorder the values, behavior, institutions, and identity of oppressed peoples to conform to the interests of the imperial classes,” (Peters, 1993, p. 140). One particular ay Peters claims this process works is through the exploitation of youth as a viable market: since youth are “vulnerable to U.
S. Commercial propaganda,” they are considered the prime group to market products to (Peters, 1993, p. 139). By creating products that boast consumerist-individualism, capitalism is framed as a system with liberators promise, instantly capturing youth (Peters, 1993). This type of exploitation has occurred in the marketing of Full. Full is specifically marketed toward young girls through not only the doll itself but also through its spread to other commodities.
Full’s image can be seen plastered all over toy stores on items such as backpacks, in- line skates, beach balls, and even a bright pink prayer mat (Nelson, 2005). In every aspect of a young girl’s life. Full is so important to these girls that one mother described how “disaster [had] struck” when the new pink Full backpacks were completely sold out and her daughters could not bring one to school (Scope, 2005). However, this Full craze did not start with Full herselfвЂ?it started with her “immoral” predecessor: Barbie.
Because Full can be seen as “a mimicry of Barbie but veiled one,” (Yakima, 2007, p. 180). Another context in which she should be considered is the global empire of Barbie as the site where cultural imperialism has prospered. Since Barbie’s creation in 1959, she has gained popularity not only in the U. S. Where she was created, but also in 140 other countries around the world (Yakima, 2007, p. 180). While the image of Barbie that has remained the most ubiquitous is the blonde hair, blue-eyed version, Barbie has since been crafted into several different races and many different ethnicities.
In the following paragraphs, I will explain how he creation of these new Barbie dolls refry only the cultural differences that can lead to successful capitalist production. In her article, “Black Barbie and the Deep Play of Difference,” Ann Ductile describes Mantel’s attempts to adhere to a vision of a Barbie-manufactured multiculturalism that “both produces and denies difference,” (Ductile, 2003, p. 337). In other words, because the U. S. Is a nation that proclaims color-blindness, the problem of what to do with the ‘Other’ is always one that is produced and denied in simultaneous moves.
To explain this concept, the creation of the African American Barbie doll is explicated. By filling an almost identical plastic mould (except for subtle facial differences to code for race) with a darker pigment of molten plastic, white standards of beauty are re-inscribed within the black doll: large breasts, thin waist, voluptuous derriere, and tall physique. Additionally, black Barbie’s created by Matter have a slightly courser, darker version of Barbie’s signature long hairвЂ?hair that is seldom naturally found on black women (Ductile, 2003, p. 337).
When asked why they chose to put long hair on these black Barbie dolls, Matter simply stated, “We can’t change the fact that long, movable hair is still a key seller,” (Ductile, 2003, p. 342). By simultaneously producing differently reclaimed Barbie dolls and denying differences in cultural interpretations of beauty, Matter can successfully create a widely marketable doll. Ductile posits that ultimately it is Barbie’s ability to be widely marketed that determines what kind of racial representations of Barbie Matter will produce (Ductile, 2003, p. 42). Ductile further demonstrates Mantel’s strategy of marketing white beauty standards when she explores the multicultural line of Barbie dolls called the Dolls of the World series. In this series, which is marketed to both young girls and adult doll collectors, different cultures are Page 3 of 7 represented through stereotyped and brightly colored depictions of what that culture supposedly looks like, ranging from dolls such as the Black Jamaican Barbie in a maid like riding gear (Ductile, 2003, p. 342).
Each doll has nearly the same mould with a few variations in skin color, making each non-white culture “represented by the same basic brown body and face mould, dolled up in different native garbs, or Mantel’s interpretation thereof,” (Ductile, 2003, p. 341). Further, as Yakima describes using Internal Crewel’s analysis of the “traveling Barbie,” these Dolls of the World dolls are not authentic representations of cultures or, for that matter, representations of cultures at all. Instead, Grew posits that these dolls are Just American dolls playing dress-up and performing these stereotyped ethnicities.
Ultimately, Ductile describes these types of signification as processes that re-solidify an old stereotype of the clothes-obsessed woman where “clothes not only make the woman, they mark [their] racial and/or cultural difference,” (Ductile, 2003, p. 341). It is important to note that hose representations, as well as the classic Barbie, have spread all around the world, refrying cultural differences that get solidified trans-nationally. At this point, it is necessary to explicate the idea presented earlier that Full is a mimicry of Barbie.
A theoretical dictionary entitled Post-colonial Studies: The Key Concepts, defines mimicry as: When colonial discourse encourages the colonized subject to “mimic” the colonizer, by adopting the colonizers cultural habits, assumptions, institutions and values, the result is never a simple reproduction of those traits. Rather, the result is a “blurred pop’ of the colonizer that can be quite threatening. This is because mimicry is never very far from mockery, since it can appear to parody whatever it mimics… Mimicry can be both ambivalent and multi-layered. Ashcroft, Griffith & Tiffin, 2000, p. 139142). Using the trajectory of the imperialist capitalist project of Barbie’s transnational popularity, Full can also be read as a capitalist cultural artifact through her existence as a mime. While constructing Full as a commodities cultural artifact is one representation of the doll, it is important to see the complications involved in rendering her this way. By dressing this doll in modest, symbolically Islamic clothing, a change is occurring in how the doll is represented in relation to the classic Barbie doll.
By taking on a similar form to Barbie, Full is miming the figure of Barbie as a tall, beautiful woman, but, in a way, is also mocking it. By donning the veil and becoming a modest version of Barbie, Full is mocking the West for its overvaluation of objectifying female sexuality. This “blurred copy’ of Full creates a complicated reading of the doll, pointing to the incongruities of both Barbie as Muslim and of the veil as a commodities object. In the following paragraphs, I will explore these incongruities at length, in order to find places for possible subjectivists.
As Fatwa El Sounding describes in her article entitled “Veiling Resistance,” European powers created a “colonial narrative of women” in which “the veil and the treatment of women epitomized Islamic inferiority,” (El Sounding, 2003, p. 595). By considering the veil and treatment of women as a sign that Islam was inherently flawed, traditional colonial powers as well as cultural imperialist powers have constructed an image of the veil that conflates the veil with women’s oppression. In direct response to this conflation, in the sass, women college students in Egypt began to wear the veil in public spaces as a sign of resistance.
El Sounding explains: ideals by becoming exemplary contemporary models. Encoded in their dress style is an affirmation of Islamic identity and morality and a rejection of Western materialism, consumerism, commercialism, and values, (El Sounding, 2003, p. 591). Page 4 of 7 In constructing a new form of subjectivity contingent upon making a feminine Islamic symbol, women in Egypt (and all around the Middle East in different contexts) have assisted processes of colonialism, cultural imperialism, as well as gender oppression to form an anticipations politics.
While the veil has been constructed as subversive and fundamentally anti-capitalist in the Islamic feminist movements of the sass (El Sounding, 2003, p. 591), the latest wave of Islamic families appeared to not have many qualms with its appropriation by a capitalist product (Scope, 2003). A possible explanation of this seemingly contradictory image of a veiled Barbie is that parents did not view Full simply as a capitalist artifact that has echoes of colonialism; arenas, perhaps, could have seen her as a teaching tool to explain modesty and Islamic morals to young girls.
As one commentator said, “If girls put scarves on their dolls when they’re young, it might make it easier when their time comes. Sometimes it is difficult for girls to put on the hajji. They feel it is the end of childhood” (Scope, 2003). By teaching girls in the form off toy they nearly ‘idealize’ that wearing the veil is a natural progression of life within their faith, this type of dress becomes normalized and rendered acceptable, thus making the transition out of childhood more smooth Yeast, 2007). Full: A place for agency?
The final analysis of this paper turns to a multi-faceted study of the reception of McDonald’s as a symbol of ultimate cultural imperialism in different specific East Asian countries, called Golden Arches East: McDonald’s in East Asia (Watson, 1997). The aim is to understand how forms of positive subjectivity can develop out of something that seems so deeply rooted in cultural imperialism. This large study acknowledges the negative aspects of McDonald’s such as the health problems and the cultural imperialist motives behind spreading McDonald’s around the globe.
However, what is interesting about this book is that it questions the reception of McDonald’s, specifically within youth culture, to find places of positive subjectivity in McDonald’s. The study found that while McDonald’s is the beacon of a cultural imperialist mission, the transnational of it becomes localized within each country it inhabits. One specific way this happens is by adapting the menu to fit the dietary needs of the country. For example, Big Macs are served without cheese in Israel to abide by a Kosher diet, while Vegetable Nuggets and the mutton-based Maharaja
Mac are on the menu in India to cater to Muslims who do not eat pork, Hindus who do not eat beef, and Janis and others who are vegetarians (Watson, 1997). While these concerted effort on the part of McDonald’s to cater to the different needs of the communities they serve, rather than forcing American food morals in these places. However, the ultimate way that the transnational is localized in these East Asian countries is the transformation of McDonald’s into a kind of youth centre in which youth can hang out with friends outside of the rigorous of a discipline-based school.
By transforming what in the U. S. Is considered a take-your-food-and-leave type of restaurant into a get-your-food-quickly-stay-awhile restaurant creates a space of agency for youth in East Asia to transform an imported restaurant into a somewhat localized version of it (Watson, 1997). In paying attention to this process, the ‘native’ subject is not Just a passive consumer, but a consumer with agency to change McDonald’s into something that they need or desire. This analysis is very useful in finding agency within Full as a doll.
Full, through this lens, becomes not Just a copy f Barbie in a veil, but Barbie done differently to fit the needs of a group of people. As mentioned earlier, a large Islamic revivalist movement swept across the Middle East in the past decade, rendering U. S. Imported cultural artifacts, such as Barbie, immoral. In its place a more moral, Islamic doll, Full, was made popular. While Full still is a capitalist cultural artifact, she is a doll with morals that girls can look up to.
Full is not a Page 5 of 7 perfect representation of a woman because of her problematic proportions, but she is still a great doll to admire. Rather than being confined to only the private realm, he has ‘respectable’ occupations such as being a teacher or a doctor, positioning her firmly as a woman with a desire to inhabit both the private and the public spheres. While, to the West, she does wear a symbol of oppressed womanhood, she wears a symbol of feminine Islamic identity to girls who will grow up playing with her.
In accepting that a transnational enterprise such as McDonald’s or Barbie is something that has happened and cannot be taken back, one can begin to analyze the places in which the ‘native’ consumer can be positioned in a place of agency within this larger, transnational cultural icon. By taking the transnational (in this case, Barbie) and making it local (with Full), a capitalist icon can be transformed into something the consumer can subvert into something newвЂ?a complicated mimesis of the original conferred to the needs of their own culture.